In the evolving landscape of travel booking, online travel agents (OTAs) such as Expedia, Booking.com and Kayak have become dominant players. While hoteliers and travel providers often accustomed committee fees charged by OTAS, in-depth research has revealed that OTA bookings are often more cost-effective than other booking channels, such as those promoted through direct bookings and traditional sales teams. This article explores hidden and labor costs associated with non-OTA channels and discusses the decline in sales team relevance in the modern travel industry.
True Costs for Non-OTA Reservation Channels
At first glance, direct bookings or bookings through traditional channels (such as phone, email, or corporate sales) look cheap as they avoid OTA commissions in the range of 15% to 25%. However, these channels have a significant hidden cost that is often overlooked.
Personnel costs
Non-OTA bookings, especially those handled through call centers, front desks, or sales teams, require considerable human resources. These include:
Staff pay and benefits: Booking agents, front desk staff and sales representatives require competitive pay, health insurance and other benefits. For medium-sized hotels, hiring a dedicated booking team costs more than $500,000 a year. Training Cost: Staff should be trained to process appointments, manage customer inquiries and upsell services. Continuous training to respond to industry trends and technology increases costs. Overtime and turnover: High hospitality turnover means frequent employment and training, but overtime allowances may be required during peak seasons, further increasing costs.
In contrast, OTAs act as a self-service platform and require minimal human intervention from the hotel side. The booking process is automated, reducing the need for dedicated staff and associated costs.
Technology and infrastructure costs
Direct booking channels require robust technology to compete with the seamless user experience offered by OTA. These include:
Booking Engine Development: Custom booking engines for hotel websites cost between $10,000 and $50,000 to develop, with annual maintenance fees of over $5,000. Website Maintenance: User-friendly, mobile-optimized websites with secure payment gateways require continuous investment in web developers, hosting and cybersecurity. Marketing Cost: To drive traffic directly into a booking channel, hotels need to invest heavily in search engine optimization (SEO), pay-per-click (PPC) ads and social media campaigns. For example, a single Google Ads campaign costs thousands of dollars per month because conversions are not guaranteed.
Meanwhile, OTA handles these costs as part of the service. Their platforms are optimized for search engines, mobile devices and global accessibility, saving you the money of building and maintaining your own infrastructure for your hotel.
Customer acquisition costs
Achieving customers via direct channels is more expensive than an OTA. Hotels required:
Investing in brand awareness: Building a recognizable brand requires significant marketing spending, including partnerships, sponsorships, and loyalty programs. Compete in a busy market: OTAS aggregates thousands of properties and makes it a one-stop shop for travelers. Hotels that rely on direct bookings often need to compete with this convenience.
OTAs leverage their vast user base and marketing budgets to attract customers and reduce the burden on individual hotels. A survey by Siteminder found that OTAS accounts for 60% of online bookings worldwide, highlighting its effectiveness in customer acquisition.
The decline in sales team importance
Historically, sales teams have played a pivotal role in the travel industry, securing corporate contracts, negotiating with tour operators, and building relationships with valuable clients. However, several factors have degenerated their importance.
Shift to digital channels
With the rise of OTAS and the consumer platform, booking power has shifted to travelers. Corporate clients rely on sales teams for once negotiated fees, but they currently use corporate booking tools such as OTA or Egencia or Egencia. A 2024 report by Phocuswright said 70% of business travelers book accommodation via digital channels, bypassing traditional sales interactions.
Automation and AI
Advances in automation and artificial intelligence have reduced the need for human intervention in sales. Chatbots, dynamic pricing algorithms, and personalized marketing tools can replicate many of the sales team's features, such as upselling packages and responding to inquiries. For example, hotels using AI-driven revenue management systems can adjust rates in real time to maximize occupancy, a task handled by sales managers.
Cost Benefit Analysis
Maintaining sales teams is expensive and quickly increases pay, fees and travel expenses. In contrast, OTAS charges predictable fees. This is often lower than the total cost of a sales team when aliquoting overhead. For small hotels or chains with limited budgets, reallocating resources from sales to digital marketing or OTA partnerships will increase your return on investment.
Changes in consumer behavior
Modern travelers place emphasis on convenience, transparency and choice. This is a qualification specific to the OTA platform. Sales teams are skilled at building relationships, but cannot compare to the speed and accessibility of OTAs. For example, Booking.com allows users to compare hundreds of properties, read reviews, and book in minutes. This is a process that takes several hours for sales reps.
OTAS value proposition
Beyond cost savings, OTA offers unique benefits that increase its value.
Global Reach: OTA works in multiple languages and currencies, making it easier to attract international travelers. For example, Expedia's platform is accessible in over 40 countries and expands the hotel market with no additional marketing costs. Data Insights: OTAs provide hotels with analysis of booking trends, customer preferences and competitive pricing, enabling data-driven decisions. Trust and Reliability: OTAS makes significant investments in fraud prevention, secure payments and customer support, reducing the risk of hotel chargebacks and conflicts.
Addressing common misconceptions
OTA critics often quote committee fees as a reason to prioritize direct bookings. However, this overlooks the comprehensive service offered by OTAS, from marketing to customer support. Additionally, hotels can offset commissions by optimizing their OTA lists to drive higher occupancy and revenue. For example, properties investing in high quality photos and detailed descriptions on Booking.com often get a 20% increase in bookings, according to industry data.
Another misconception is that direct bookings promote greater customer loyalty. While the loyalty program is valuable, OTAS also offers loyalty schemes such as Expedia Rewards, which encourage repeat bookings on multiple properties. Moreover, the convenience of OTAs often outweighs brand loyalty for price-sensitive travelers.
OTA commissions may seem sudden, but overall analysis shows that these platforms are often the most cost-effective booking channels when you consider the hidden costs of personnel, technology, customer acquisition, and more. The decline in traditional sales teams further highlights the efficiency of OTAs as digital platforms and automation take the central stage in the travel industry. For hotels and travel providers, accepting OTAs as strategic partners can unlock significant savings and growth opportunities in increasingly competitive markets, rather than necessary evil.
By understanding the true costs of non-OTA channels and adapting to the digital-first preferences of modern travelers, the industry can move towards a more efficient and profitable future.
For industry-related news, click here.
